Introduction:
In procurement, supplier evaluation and assessment assist organisations verify prospective suppliers and review current partnerships. Competitiveness depends on these judgements in fast-paced sectors. A low-risk, high-quality supplier portfolio helps firms optimise resource utilisation, improve procurement, and form long-term, mutually beneficial partnerships. This article discusses supplier evaluation and assessment’s relevance, advantages, and best practices.
What’s Supplier Evaluation?
Supplier evaluation in procurement involves formal assessments of suppliers’ performance against several criteria to evaluate if they match organisational needs. The goal is to build a low-risk, best-in-class supplier portfolio.
Departments continuously evaluate suppliers as a pre-qualification phase in purchasing.
Hald and Ellegaard (2011) define supplier assessment as “the process of quantifying the efficiency and effectiveness of supplier action.”
In simple words, supplier assessment involves determining if a provider fits your business. Also considers your present supplier base to assess performance and find cost-saving, risk-mitigation, and continuous improvement opportunities. Thus, open and equitable alignment of objectives, data, and analysis with suppliers is the first step in effective supplier appraisal.
Importance of Supplier Evaluation
Every procurement organisation seeks to maximise resource use. To get the highest quality, affordability, flexibility, and dependability contracts, suppliers must be evaluated.
The supplier assessment process is difficult, but identifying low-risk, high-quality suppliers and long-term business connections is worth it.
Others benefits of supplier evaluation include:
- Risk mitigation: Careful supplier screening reduces regulatory, contract, and security risks connected with dealing with external systems.
- Improvements in supplier performance immediately affect procurement process performance. Supplier assessment and appraisal factors determine 57.1% of procurement performance (Murigi 2014). Since supplier evaluation encourages efficiency and innovation, suppliers enhance their operations. When firms base choices on supplier performance targets, the results are astounding.
- Cost reduction: Supplier assessment affects product quality and cost, thus it’s important for any company. Organisations benefit from a little cost and quality increase from supplier selection.
- Leveraged supply base: Evaluating supplier performance sets a benchmark, which improves results. It also allows firms establish goals and actions based on suppliers’ capabilities and performance.
- A quality criteria helps evaluate suppliers by encouraging them to increase efficiency and innovation. Supplier performance is crucial to a purchasing organization’s success. Also, the seller and customer must agree on their quality.
- Improved supplier relationships: Effective supplier management fosters communication, collaboration, and loyalty, which leads to long-term, mutually beneficial partnerships.
- Increased business results: Top suppliers allow you to offer higher-quality, cheaper products and services. You can better service consumers and increase sales and loyalty.
Evaluation of Suppliers
The supplier assessment process begins with assessing your company’s needs and creating a list of requirements to discuss with vendors. After that, a selection criterion is created to evaluate vendors, including a scoring method.
A market study determines the number of suppliers who will participate in the RFQ process. A small group of suppliers and an initial bidders’ list is a version of the second phase. The following providers meet the standards. Then, vendors on the list get an RFI requesting further information. The RFI asks if the firm is interested and gathers enough information to make a general assessment.
After receiving bids or RFIs, all corporate stakeholders assess providers. Results and discussions determine supplier selection.
Most procurement specialists agree there is no optimum supplier assessment method. So corporations try different methods to discover what works. The evaluation process reduces risks and maximises value for the procurement organisation, regardless of strategy.
It’s vital to note that supplier evaluation continues after selection. Once an association is formed, the supplier’s performance must be monitored. Ranking suppliers by metrics helps firms determine which ones are best and which need development.
Supplier Evaluation Criteria
Supplier evaluation involves qualitative and quantitative criteria. Creating uniform selection criteria and applying them to all case is insufficient.
Your company’s mission, vision, and business goals should guide supplier evaluation. We should also consider quality, pricing, financial integrity, corporate social responsibility, communication, and cultural convictions.
Your organization’s priorities must be considered while evaluating contractors and providers. For instance, a healthcare organisation must prioritise data security and regulatory rules over other issues.
However, corporations often face opposing concrete and intangible elements that make decisions difficult.
The supplier selection process must involve all essential firm stakeholders, such as procurement, engineering, logistics, manufacturing, etc. Stakeholders must agree on selection criteria. Doing so ensures each is weighted according to significance, corporate priorities, and strategy.
12 Supplier Evaluation Criteria
Effective supplier assessment criteria affect an organization’s buying performance.
Supplier assessment and appraisal criteria determine 57.1% of procurement process performance, according to Murigi (2014).
The most typical factors are materials supply, quality, pricing, financial status, communication, and technology. Many other characteristics may be more significant, depending on the method. Thus, creating an exclusive list is difficult.
Below are some factors an organisation may use to evaluate suppliers:
- Quality is a difficult notion to describe. IBM defined quality best for supplier assessment: “Quality means meeting customer needs.
Quality products and services are when supplier and customer agree on needs and meet them.” Quality management includes department, supplier, and customer interaction. After setting quality standards, the manufacturing process must be organised to achieve and sustain them.
To achieve this, quality management has four interdependent functions: defining standards, assessment, control, and assurance. An external assessment determines how well the procedures meet national and international standards. ISO-9000/9001 is an example. - Price/Cost: Expectations include present and future cost needs, cost reduction, continual improvement, and overall cost (including acquisition, inventory, and disposal expenses).
- Performance Delivery: Guaranteed product delivery at the proper time and quantity. It entails reviewing customer orders, scheduling production, and determining the time needed to meet client expectations.
Service includes following directions, managing complaints, convenience of business, and prompt response. All these variables make defining service criteria difficult.
Subjective judgements are used to evaluate suppliers’ services. This requires thoughts on assistance quality, supplier attitude, response speed, support personnel credentials, etc.
Most firms use a basic rating system of excellent, satisfactory, and bad for supplier service, with reasons.
- Financial Strength: Assessing a supplier’s finances. It implies determining if a provider can invest in resources, pay suppliers and workers, and satisfy debt and financial responsibilities. These elements are crucial to supply disruption.
- Lead-Time: The time between order and delivery is a dependability concern.
- Technical aptitude: This factor evaluates a supplier’s technical aptitude and capacity to follow progress.
- Flexibility: A supplier’s capacity to modify numbers and delivery periods to meet customer demands.
- Development considers innovation and improvement to enhance goods and save prices.
- The management approach is crucial for a corporation seeking long-term supplier partnerships. The crucial quadrant suppliers, who offer vital commodities in large quantities, usually form such agreements. Parties must agree on goals and measurements to start a partnership. If properly formed, such partnerships might lead to cost-saving and product-development collaboration.
- Geographic Location: Geographic closeness is significant since increasing distance might cause transport, logistical, and currency changes, reducing flexibility.
- Environmental Regulation Compliance: Supply chain partnerships increasingly ask suppliers to meet sustainability standards.
Finding the Key Supplier Evaluation Criteria
It advised organisations to categorise supplier selection criteria as follows:
Mandatory—To be on the bid list, suppliers must fulfil these requirements.
These are preferred, although a provider can still bid. Nevertheless, these factors will determine supplier selection.
Leading—limit concerns to a few. These difficulties will distinguish great vendors from the others. The supplier selection process should prioritise these problems.
5 Tips for Supplier Evaluation Success
- Procurement managers must develop scoring criteria to evaluate and choose suppliers for business and keep them on the authorised vendor list.
Supplier selection criteria vary. However, these requirements can conflict. For instance, cost and quality can conflict. Thus, factors must be weighted to determine which provider offers the best trade-off of all criteria. Use fewer critical criteria than a huge list, as each will count little in the final score.
- Since certain criteria are qualitative, evaluating them is challenging. More subjective and person-dependent factors. Cost is quantifiable, while product or service quality is qualitative. Not immediately measurable. In that instance, consider product rejection costs, post-sale services costs, etc.
- Companies struggle to manage hundreds of thousands of suppliers across functions. It may be addressed by building and administering a central supplier database. Ignite Procurement automates and centralises supplier data and analytics.
- Determine the evaluator. Procurement employees usually serve this role, however analysts are best for high-cost or difficult cases. A consultant may help with time-consuming tasks like research, preparing the RFP, and financial analysis, which the organisation may not have.
- Without a deadline, the final selection and recruiting process is tough.
Quick Supplier Evaluation Checklist
Supplier review is ongoing and keeps consumers and goals in mind. To ensure you evaluate vendors using best practices, check these steps:
- Check your supplier’s performance regularly.
- Set supplier assessment criteria, standards, methods, and procedures.
- Standardise your supplier evaluation using a form to make better, quicker, and more strategic judgements.
- Choose and classify suppliers depending on supplier assessment goals.
- Use statistics and facts in supplier interactions. Always communicate, especially with critical suppliers.
- Technology optimises information utilisation.
- Talk to your vendors often to improve suboptimal areas.
- Reevaluate supplier performance using your criteria.
- Do it again.
Conclusion:
Continuously creating criteria, analysing performance, and communicating with suppliers is key to supplier assessment. Best practises and digital technologies help organisations decrease risks, costs, supplier performance, and develop strategic alliances. A comprehensive supplier assessment improves procurement efficiency and the organization’s success and sustainability. The evaluation method is reviewed and updated to keep the supplier base current with the company’s goals and market expectations.
