NITRAS Nylon Gloves, White

Standards and labels

• EN 388:2016

  EN 388:2016 is a European standard for measuring the performance of protective gloves against mechanical risks (abrasion, cut, tear, and puncture). The standard includes test methods and performance requirements for gloves to be considered compliant. Test results are reported using a series of four numbers, each representing the performance level achieved in one of the tests.

  Test results

  Puncture Resistance Level 0

  EN 388:2016 specifies safety glove standards, including puncture resistance. The test result Level 0 in puncture resistance indicates that the product does not meet the minimal requirements set by the standard for protecting against punctures. The test method used involves using a standardized stylus with a specified force applied to the glove material. This is measured by the amount of force needed before the stylus punctures through the glove material. A Level 0 result signifies that the glove failed to provide any standardized level of protection during the testing procedure, which means it is not suitable for environments where puncture resistance is required for safety purposes .

  Tear Resistance Level 3

  EN 388:2016 is a European standard that specifies methods for testing the resistance of protective gloves against mechanical hazards, such as abrasion, cuts, punctures, and tearing. The Tear Resistance Level 3 indicates a high level of protection, where the gloves can withstand significant tearing forces. The test for determining tear resistance involves subjecting the glove material to a mechanical force until it tears, measuring the force required to initiate and continue the tear. For Level 3, gloves must withstand a force between 50 to 75 Newtons before tearing. This robust level of tear resistance is particularly suitable for demanding environments where gloves are exposed to activities that might cause extensive wear or tearing, such as handling heavy or rough materials, industrial assembly, and construction tasks. Gloves with this level of tear resistance provide enhanced durability and safety, reducing the risk of injuries and increasing the longevity of the glove in tough working conditions.

  Abrasion Resistance Level 0

  In the standard EN 388:2016, an Abrasion Resistance result of Level 0 indicates the lowest protection level against abrasion for protective gloves. This result reflects that the gloves did not meet the minimum requirements set by the standard for resisting abrasion, which involves a glove's capability to withstand surface wear from rubbing. The test for Abrasion Resistance under EN 388:2016 involves repeatedly rubbing the glove material against an abrasive surface under controlled conditions. The level of protection is categorized from 0 (lowest) to 4 (highest), based on the number of cycles completed before a hole appears in the glove material. The practical implication of a result at Level 0 is that the gloves are not suitable for environments where abrasion resistance is necessary, and alternative gloves with higher abrasion resistance should be considered for such tasks.

  Cut Resistance, Coup Test Level 1

  The EN 388:2016 standard is dedicated to gauging the mechanical risks for hand protection where a Cut Resistance, Coup Test Level 1 indicates minimal resistance to cutting because material achieved between 1.2 and 2.5 cycles before being cut through during the test. It means that the product tested at this level offers basic protection against shallow cuts, suitable for tasks with low risk of cut injuries. The test method used involves a rotating circular blade under a fixed force making contact with the fabric or material being tested. The blade moves back and forth across the material until a cut-through is achieved. The number of cycles required to cut through the sample at a consistent speed determines the cut resistance, with Level 1 being the second lowest rating after level 0. Products at this level are applicable in scenarios where there are minimal hazards from sharp objects, hence ideal for light duties where there is no significant risk of deep cuts.